Is it possible to exclude the artist’s interpretation when
viewing comics? Even if it is possible, does this defeat the point of using
visual representation for a story? The visual medium utilized by comics’ forces
the artist’s perception of the story into the mind of viewer. Imagination is a
critical component of our conceptualization of these stories. The way in which
an individual visualizes the structure of a story is a personal means of
understanding. For example, how one constructs the characters, their
expressions, their dress, and even their mannerisms is a tool that is used for
the individual to personally relate to the story. Our own imagination acts as a
conduit of relatability. However, this tool is taken away by the visual nature
of comics. Instead of our own method of relation, the artist’s perception is
forced upon us. A barrier is breached by comics in a way that written or spoken
stories do not do.
The Genesis
story told by R. Crumb and the manga version demonstrate the different
approaches an artist can take. R. Crumb’s drawings are more realistic than the
manga story. The anatomically realistic pictures in association with Crumb’s
biblical terminology establishes his story as more educational than
entertaining. His straightforward approach establishes Adam and Eve as seemingly
empty vessels. They do not have the personality that is evident in the
depictions of Adam and Eve in the manga version. The manga story uses vibrant
expressions and more modernized speech as such providing Adam and Eve with a
little more personality. Thus, exhibiting how an artist’s perception is
apparent in their drawings and how such opinions can intrude upon the viewer’s
own imagination. Furthermore, how does the individual maintain his or her sense
of self when reading comics? 