When I first started thinking about modern day apocalyptic scenarios, my mind immediately went to terrorist attacks, nuclear bombs, natural disasters, etc. Dan Archer's article Apocalypse Left and Right helped me to realize that Apocalypse applies to issues on a much smaller scale and that the theme has a strong connection to politics. Archer notes prophets that speak out against abortion as "The ultimate human atrocities [which] singles the end of human society." Similarly, Tim Lahaye warns against homosexuality, claiming "when sodomy fills the nations cup of man's abominations God earmarks the nation for destruction." In these examples the prophets are not predicting the end of the world through physical destruction, but rather mankind's immorality (in their view). Another controversial political issue that could be deemed apocalyptic is the gun control debate. Although abusing weapons may not a bring total end to the world, it is a serious fear for many Americans that guns in the wrong hands could lead to major tragedy. Numerous school shootings and gun mishaps that seem to be occurring on a regular basis serve as real-life examples of this fear coming true. For the parents who's children are killed as innocent victims their world did ends. The same goes for the teachers, staff, and fellow students involved in school shootings with whom those tragic memories will remain forever. I see the prophets in the gun debate issue as the numerous political activists and parents of victims speaking out to create new laws. As in all other stories we have discussed, they are desperately pleading with the government and american public to make a change. Without these changes in our attitudes and ultimately our laws, more people will die and personal worlds will continue to come crashing down.
The abortion and gay marriage debates align with typical political/religious affiliations. That is to say, the more conservative anti-abortion/homosexual groups finds support for their cause in Christianity. They are guided by the bible which tells them the end of the world is coming if these immoral acts persist. (Disclaimer- I am not trying to say ALL christians believe this or dismiss religion in any way) Alternatively, my gun control argument takes the opposite approach. It is typically the conservative side that argues for their right to bear arms, while the pro-gun control liberals are not led by a specific religious force. Does this lessen its legitimacy as an apocalyptic source? How exactly does the intersection between politics and religion play into how we view apocalyptic threats. Are they more believable and persuasive if are motivated by religion?
No comments:
Post a Comment