As Shabana Mir discussed in both her lecture and article,
“You Can’t Really Look Normal and Dress Modestly”, appearance is a crucial part
of our identity. Although we may hope and believe that we’re in control of our
first impressions, there is something that always gets the chance to speak
first – our clothes. Despite our best efforts to reserve judgment until
actually getting to know someone, it’s incredibly difficult to not categorize
an individual at first glance. Later on, we may be able to look past this initial
judgment but nonetheless a first assessment has already been made. It’s hard to
deny this aspect of ourselves. It’s how we work to make sense of our
surroundings and generally function on a day-to-day basis. The issue to discuss
here is the disconnect that occurs between the message we put out and the
message that is received.
What I hope to
convey is not always what others pick up on. As such, a fair amount of control
lies with the observer. As I was sitting down to consider how religious
clothing or paraphernalia factors into identity on campus, I realized that I
couldn’t come up with many examples. This may be attributed to the fact that
there just simply isn’t a lot of religious clothing worn around campus. Or
perhaps it’s because I’m not looking for it. The most common example I could
think of was cross necklaces. Do I notice these because they’re most common or because,
as a Catholic, this is a symbol I am most attuned to pick up? The answers to
the commonality of religious paraphernalia on campus are not ones that I know.
However, thinking about this issue drew my attention to the power of perception.
It highlighted the fact that while we may like to believe our identity is in
our hands, the beliefs and perceptions of our peers in fact play a significant
role in our identities. Thus, bringing forth the question of how private is the
formation of our identities? Do we internalize the perceptions of self that
society throws back at us?
No comments:
Post a Comment