Why do individuals need an authentic source? Why must we
have a real guru or supernatural force to legitimize our faith? In the film Kumaré, Kumaré’s followers were willing
to listen to him because he seemed to be a real guru. However, as the film
progressed, Kumaré provided the same amount of help and peace that one derives
from a “real” religion. In a sense, the film demonstrated that authenticity is
not necessary to give people what they need. This sentiment was echoed
throughout the readings this week. If the power to attain inner peace has been
ours along, then why do we need an authentic source to act as a conduit for us?
Where does the need for authenticity come from? Why do we need the son of God
or a mystical guru to help us? If Kumaré had presented himself as an average
man, would anyone have listened to him? Probably not. Perhaps we crave this
authenticity because the guidelines that we adopt from religion are so
consuming. As Martyn Oliver argued in “10 Things Every College Student Needs to
Know About Religion”, ritual can be more important than belief. So, if one is
going to so strongly adopt a code to live by or if said code is already
integral to their identity than it has to be extremely significant. If it is
going to take or already holds such a prestigious position in one’s life, then
it has to have a fair amount of meaning. Meaning that powerful can be found in
an “authentic” source like God or an Indian guru. Their “realness” elevates the
status of one’s belief and perhaps provides a sense of affirmation for its adoption.
No comments:
Post a Comment